Legal Opinion
Robyns v. City of Dearborn
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1954No. Docket 56, Calendar 46,289PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
Defendant appeals from decree enjoining enforcement of a zoning ordinance against plaintiffs’ property because unreasonable and confiscatory as applied thereto.
Each of plaintiffs owns 1 of 8 lots on the south ■side of Ford road in the city of Dearborn across from the lots in Dearborn township involved in Ritenour v. Township of Dearborn, 326 Mich 242. Seven of the lots have a width of 20 feet and one 24.44 feet, fronting on Ford road, with depths varying from 100 to 110 feet. Some of plaintiffs purchased their lots prior to, and some after, the adoption of the original ordinance which zoned…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Hitchman v. Township of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Hammond v. Bloomfield Hills Building InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Ecorse v. Peoples Community Hospital AuthorityMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Paragon Properties Co. v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Harrington Glen, Inc. v. Municipal Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Congressional School of Aeronautics, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Joint Ventures, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Board of Com'rs of State Inst. v. TALLAHASSEE B. & T. CO.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.