Legal Opinion

Reed v. Rootstown Township Board of Zoning Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1984No. 83-177PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 519.14(B) empowers a township board of zoning appeals to grant variances. The section states as follows:

“The township board of zoning appeals may: * * * (B) Authorize, upon appeal, in specific cases, such variance from the terms of the zoning resolution as will not be contrary to the public interest, where, owing to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the resolution will result in unnecessary hardship, and so that the spirit of the resolution shall be observed and substantial justice done.”

The question presented is whether the board’s denial of appellants’ request for a variance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Negin v. Board of Building & Zoning Appeals of the City of MentorOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Town Center Development Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shemo v. Mayfield HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Set Products, Inc. v. Bainbridge Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ketchel v. Bainbridge TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. 506 Phelps Holdings, L.L.C. v. Cincinnati Union BethelOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API