Legal Opinion

Michelsen v. Harvey

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1991No. 21741PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case involves a property dispute between appellants John and Ann Michelsen (“Michelsens”) and respondents James Harvey, Samuel Harvey, Elizabeth Harvey Blaikie, and John Blaikie (“Harveys”). The Michelsens and the Harveys each own a parcel of land bordering Lake Tahoe. These parcels are adjacent to each other and were once part of a large tract of land owned by Gertrude Church (“Church”), the Harveys’ grandmother. A wide, sandy beach area is located directly lakeward of the parcel now owned by the Michelsens. Ownership of this beach area is disputed, and both parties claim…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Stix v. La RueNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Reno Brewing Co. v. PackardNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Langworthy v. ColemanNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Wilfon v. Cyril Hampel 1985 TrustNevada Supreme Court · 1989

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. BaileyNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Michelsen v. HarveyNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Schiller v. Fid. Nat'l Title Ins. Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Vogel Vs. The Marla Bay Protective Ass'N, Inc. C/W 81424Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Vogel Vs. The Marla Bay Protective Ass'N, Inc. C/W 81424Nevada Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API