Legal Opinion

Garmond v. Kinney

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1978No. 11523PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAYNE, Justice.

Plaintiffs Stella Garmond and Beverly Flores brought suit individually and as owners of lots in San Miguel Estates seeking a prescriptive easement over land belonging to the defendant, Kinney Brick Company. The land involved is located in the Manzano Mountains. The trial court granted the easement to the plaintiffs and Kinney appeals. We reverse.

In order for the court to grant an easement in favor of the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs must show by clear and convincing evidence that they used the roadway in question openly, uninterruptedly, peaceably, notoriously, adversely…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Adams v. TatschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Martinez v. MundyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sanchez v. Dale Bellamah Homes of New Mexico, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Associated Petroleum Transport, Ltd. v. ShepardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Price Ex Rel. MoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. DeArmond v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Brooks v. TannerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Trigg v. AllemandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Marchant v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API