Herz & Lewis, Inc. v. Union Bank

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Appellant claims that the' court below erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of appellees. The issue to be resolved is whether appellant had the right to rely on appellees’ representation more than two years after it was made.

Since this case has been disposed of by way of summary judgment in favor of appellees, we review the facts in a light most favorable to appellant. Hackin v. First Nat. Bank, 101 Ariz. 350, 419 P.2d 529 (1966). Appellant is a wholesale jeweler based in Los Angeles, California. In the course of its business, it had dealings with several…