Legal Opinion

Kretsch v. Barton

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 8, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00411Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Karla Kretsch, et al., No. CV-23-00411-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 John Barton, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against Defendants John Barton and 16 Susan Barton (sued as “Jane Doe Barton”), a married couple. (Doc. 22, “Mot.”). 17 Defendants have not filed a response. As set forth below, the Court will grant the motion 18 in part and deny the motion in part and direct entry of default judgment against Defendants 19 in the amount of $1,099,678.63. 20…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. In Re Balbir Singh Tuli, Debtor. Balbir Singh Tuli v. Republic of IraqCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Curtis B. Danning, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Fenton, Lavine & Co., a Partnership v. Beau Berlinski LavineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API