Legal Opinion

United States v. Plants

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided September 30, 2002No. Misc Doc 2002-03PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BURD, Senior Judge:

The military judge in this case dismissed the charges and specifications because he found a denial of speedy trial under Article 10, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 810. The government has brought an appeal of his decision to us under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862.

The general court-martial of Captain Plants began on 29 July 2002 at Andersen Air Force Base (AFB), Guam. The allegations against him consisted of one specification of violating a lawful general regulation on divers occasions by using a government computer to store, process, or display sexually explicit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. KossmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. TerryUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  2. United States v. DiMuccioUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. HobbsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. McCulloughArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API