Legal Opinion

United States v. DiMuccio

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 26, 2005No. Misc. Dkt. 2004-04PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SMITH, Judge:

The military judge in this case suppressed a positive drug urinalysis test result and a confession by the accused. He concluded the accused was not properly included in a unit urinalysis inspection ordered by the commander of an Arizona Air National Guard (ANG) wing, because, at the time of the inspection, the accused was on active duty and not part of the ANG unit. The government appealed the military judge’s ruling to this Court under Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862. We find the military judge’s factual determinations to be supported by the record and his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perpich v. Department of DefenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. BurrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. WhiteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. CampbellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. EvansU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Torrence v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API