Legal Opinion

United States v. McCullough

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided July 21, 2004No. ARMY MISC. 20031217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES FILED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 62, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE

HARVEY, Senior Judge:

The government’s timely appeal under Article 62, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 862 [hereinafter UCMJ], is granted. The military judge’s decision to dismiss the charges and specifications with prejudice due to lack of a speedy trial under Article 10, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 810, is vacated. We hold that appellee’s right to a speedy trial was not violated.

The government, however, caused Private (PVT) Morales, a potentially exculpatory,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Samoa Government v. MajhorHigh Court of American Samoa · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API