Legal Opinion

United States v. Hobbs

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 26, 2005No. Misc. Dkt. 2005-04PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MATHEWS, Judge:

The military judge in this case granted a motion to suppress evidence indicating a urine sample taken from the accused, Technical Sergeant (TSgt) Jason J. Hobbs, tested positive for the presence of benzoylecgonine, a metabolite of cocaine. The government appeals that decision pursuant to Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862. On careful consideration of that appeal, the record to this point in the proceedings, and the excellent appellate briefs prepared by both sides, we conclude that the military judge erred in suppressing TSgt Hobbs’ urinalysis results. We…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API