Legal Opinion

Wirz v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1978No. 3516PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BOOCHEYER, C. J., and RABI-NOWITZ, CONNOR, BURKE and MATTHEWS, JJ. RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Appellant Wirz was arrested 1 for the offense of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of AS 28.35.030. Subsequent to his arrest, Wirz was taken to the police station where a breathalyzer test was administered. Wirz did not refuse to take the breathalyzer test when requested to do so by the arresting officer. In the district court, Wirz moved to suppress the results of the breathalyzer test on the ground that he was not informed of his “right”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. StoverOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Puller v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WooleryIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Copelin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Graham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Palmer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API