Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Julius E. Diesen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 1927No. 25,989PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 215 N.W. 427, 217 N.W. 356. On September 30, 1927, the following opinion was filed: The application is based upon respondent's conviction of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude.

The record is incomplete. The referee certifies that by reason of an attached stipulation the hearing was not had. Respondent by the stipulation offered to prove, if a hearing were had, certain matters designated in the stipulation as paragraphs 8 to 19, inclusive, being substantially matters alleged in his answer, tending to prove that the misdemeanor of which he was convicted was not committed under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Disbarment of Julius E. DiesenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Rheb v. Bar Ass'n of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. In Re Discipline of BunkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API