Legal Opinion

Alkow v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1952No. L. A. 22026PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner was charged in twelve counts with the violation of his oath and duties as an attorney at law (Bus. & Prof. Code, ch. 4, art. 6, § 6103; art. 4, §§ 6067, 6068), the violation of rules 2 and 9 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of The State Bar of California (soliciting employment by advertisement; commingling of funds, 33 Cal.2d 27, 30), and the commission of acts involving inoral turpitude and dishonesty (Bus. & Prof. Code, ch. 4, art. 6, § 6106). After four hearing’s, the local administrative committee found petitioner guilty as charged and recommended to the Board of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hollywood Cleaning & Pressing Co. v. Hollywood Laundry Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Jacobs v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Marsh v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Waterman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Tomlinson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hamilton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Alkow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API