Goldfine v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
The verdict was for defendant. On motion of plaintiffs for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict, judgment was ordered for plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.
October 3, 1938, plaintiffs sold and delivered to defendant a farm tractor on conditional sales contract. On the same day defendant, after using the tractor for some few minutes, discovered defects therein and sought to return it, rescinding the sale and demanding a return of his down payment of money and used machinery. Plaintiffs refused the return, and later, upon defendant’s refusal to pay the balance of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Osborn v. WillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Thom v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- National Equipment Corp. v. VoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Woodward v. Western Canada Colonization Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Berryman v. RiegertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.