Osborn v. Will
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The action is one to recover damages for fraud, for false oral representations made by defendants to plaintiffs to induce them to purchase two lots and the dwelling house situated thereon in the city of Minneapolis.
Clarke Nicholson and his mother, Antoinette Nicholson (not now a party to the suit) were the fee owners of the property. They had sold it on contract to defendant Carl H. Will, and he and his wife, Helen R. Will, were occupying the premises under the contract. Plaintiffs negotiated with the Wills and Clarke…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- State ex rel. Cothren v. LeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- N. C. Antle & Bro. v. SextonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Bullitt v. FarrarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Swanson v. DomningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Hanrahan v. Safway Steel Scaffold Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Kundiger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.