Legal Opinion
New York Times Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 2005No. B183768PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
We hold the trial court order granting a motion for reconsideration violated Code of Civil Procedure section 1008, 1 authoritatively construed in Le Francois v. Goel (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1094 [29 Cal.Rptr.3d 249] (Le Francois), a case decided after the trial court ruling. Section 1008, subdivision (a) requires that a party seeking reconsideration base its motion upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law. The moving party also must provide a satisfactory explanation for the failure to make the showing at or before the time the challenged order was issued. The moving…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Gilberd v. AC TRANSITCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Wall Street Network, Ltd. v. New York Times Co.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- In Re Marriage of BartholdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Forrest v. Department of CorporationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. VirgaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Reynolds v. City of CalistogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.