Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Barthold
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 15, 2008No. A116083PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, P. J.
I
INTRODUCTION
The California Supreme Court held, in Le Francois v. Goel (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1094 [29 Cal.Rptr.3d 249, 112 P.3d 636] (Le Francois), that even when Code of Civil Procedure section 1008 (section 1008) precludes a party from moving for reconsideration, a trial court has inherent authority to correct an erroneous ruling on its own motion. In this marital dissolution case, the trial judge denied a postjudgment motion filed by the wife. She promptly filed a motion for reconsideration. The trial judge determined that the motion did not in fact meet the requirements of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Rubenstein v. RubensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- New York Times Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Kerns v. CSE Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- DARLING, HALL & RAE v. KrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Das v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Pinela v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Nieto v. Blue Shield of California Life & Health InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Thomson v. CanyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.