Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Gonzalez

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1957No. Civ. 21861PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendant Gonzalez had been operating under the fictitious name of Gonzalez and Blanco when he entered upon a joint venture with defendant East India Trading Company, Inc., for the purchase of beans from appellant. The complaint alleged that on November 3, 1952, respondents contracted to purchase from appellant a cargo of pinto beans as follows: 31,000 one-hundred pound bags at $9.10 per bag for Number 1 grade beans; $8.85 per bag for Number 2 grade beans; $8.60 per bag for Number 3 grade beans. Respondents accepted from appellant beans as follows: 1,971,916 pounds of Number 1 grade beans;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Constans v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Craven v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Renfer v. SkaggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kralyevich v. MagriniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Tagney v. HoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Cook v. BordiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Lewis, Miller & Co. v. Carrick CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API