Craven v. Central Pacific Railroad
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the court below denying appellants' motion for a new trial.
The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries received by the appellant Nettie R. Craven, who is the wife of the other appellant, in alighting from a *346train of cars of respondent. As she was about to get off the train at,or near, a place called Willow Street Station, in Alameda County, she was either thrown or fell violently to the ground, and was injured; and the main question in the case was one of fact, namely: After the train had stopped, did respondent’s employees, without…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Randall v. Northwestern Telegraph Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Martinez v. PlanelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Fitzpatrick v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Largan v. Central RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by24 opinions
- Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Zucker v. . WhitridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Platter v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.