Legal Opinion
Van Loo v. Cajun Operating Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 1, 2014No. Case No. 14-cv-10604PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CHURCH’S CHICKEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT AND TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND [12] AND GRANTING RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS II THROUGH V OF THE COMPLAINT AND TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND [15]
LAURIE J. MICHELSON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Donald and Harriet Van Loo bring this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461. They assert that Defendants Cajun Operating Company d/b/a Church’s Chicken (“Church’s”), Reliance Standard Life Insurance…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lebahn v. National Farmers Union Uniform Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Shields v. United of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Loo v. Cajun Operating Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Prime Rate Premium Finance Corp. v. LarsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Van Loo v. Cajun Operating Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.