Legal Opinion

Lebahn v. National Farmers Union Uniform Pension Plan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2016No. 15-3201PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, commonly known as ERISA. Invoking ERISA, Mr. Trent Lebahn and his wife claim that a pension-plan consultant breached a fiduciary duty by misstating the amount of the monthly pension payments that Mr. Lebahn would receive if he were to retire. But under ERISA, the plan consultant could be considered a fiduciary only if she exercised discretionary authority over the plan’s administration. On appeal, we ask: Does a consultant exercise discretionary authority in administering the plan…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Khalik v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ross v. University of TulsaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  2. Reserve Mechanical Corp. v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  3. Mohammad v. Albuquerque Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Bertolo v. RaemischDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020
  5. Bertolo v. RaemischDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API