Legal Opinion
Van Loo v. Cajun Operating Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 6, 2016No. Case No. 14-cv-10604PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [78] AND DENYING DEFENDANT CHURCH’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [81]
LAURIE J. MICHELSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Donna Van Loo was a corporate attorney employed by Defendant Cajun Operating Company d/b/a Church’s Chicken (“Church’s”). She purchased life insurance (provided by former co-defendant, Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company) as part of her Church’s benefits package. Van Loo increased her coverage throughout her employment, and Church’s, as the Plan Administrator, represented to her— through its intranet site…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donald Van Loo v. Cajun Operating Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017