Loo v. Cajun Operating Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING CROSS-DEFENDANT RELIANCE’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT . CHURCH’S’ CROSS-COMPLAINT [41], DENYING CROSS-DEFENDANT CHURCH’S’ MOTION TO AMEND THE CROSS-COMPLAINT [50], AND DENYING AS MOOT CROSS-DEFENDANT RELIANCE’S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY [62]
LAURIE J. MICHELSON, District Judge
Donna Van Loo was an employee, of Cross-Plaintiff Cajun Operating Company *1100d/b/a Church’s Chicken (“Church’s”). Church’s provided life insurance to Van Loo and its other employees through Cross-Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. The Policy required that insureds submit an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Van Loo v. Cajun Operating Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- Kristopher I. Lapko, et al. v. United Wholesale Mortgage LLC, and United Wholesale Mortgage LLC 401(k) CommitteeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026
- Romano v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021