Legal Opinion
Pacourek v. Inland Steel Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 16, 1996No. 94 C 0130PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Inland Steel Company’s (“Inland Steel”) motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b). For the reasons that follow, the court denies Inland’s motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are uncontested. 1 Plaintiff Charline Pacourek (“Pacourek”) started working at Inland Steel in March 1975. In 1987, Pacourek began seeing a doctor regarding her infertility. That year, Pacourek missed several days of work because of these doctor appointments. In March 1991,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sidney Abbott v. Randon Bragdon, D.M.D.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Gabriel v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Lehmuller v. Incorporated Village of Sag HarborDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Berk v. Bates Advertising USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998