Legal Opinion

Ogren v. Inner Harbor Land Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1927No. Docket No. 4225PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This is an appeal upon the judgment-roll wherein it appears that the facts necessary to a consideration of the case upon appeal may be stated substantially as follows: On or about June 24, 1913, the defendant executed a conditional sale contract with the plaintiff, therein agreeing to sell to the latter a certain lot in the Inner Harbor Tract of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, for the principal sum of $900, $90 of which was paid on said date, installments of $10 each were to be paid each month, and the defendant agreed to furnish a good and sufficient deed and certificate of title upon full…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kares v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Smith v. Phœnix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Conlin v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Gould v. MurchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1879

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mesich v. Board of County Com'rs of McKinley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  2. City of Vernon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Krobitzsch v. MiddletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Lamb v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Carey v. CusackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API