Legal Opinion

Keith v. Schievelbein

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1928No. File No. 5974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

This appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint. The complaint alleged that plaintiff, appellant herein, as attorney for Farmer’s- Bank of Humboldt, prepared a summons and -complaint asking- judgment against defendant, which summons and complaint were served on defendant on January 22, 1924; “that on the 24th day of March, 1924, the plaintiff prepared an attorney’s lien in the sum' of $99.81 for money, advanced as costs and for services rendered the Farmers’ Bank of Humboldt, an-d said' attorney’s lien was served on the defendant, Gust Sdh-ievelbein, on the 24th day…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Billesbach v. LarkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. In re Yankton-Clay County Drainage DitchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Plucker v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Security State Bank v. SykoraSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steinmetz v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ind. Sch. Dist., No. 1 v. BordewykSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Gurney v. GurneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API