Legal Opinion

Gurney v. Gurney

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1932No. File No. 7453PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Where it appears from the record that the judgment of the trial court was correct, it should not be reversed on appeal, even though based on erroneous conclusions or wrong reasons. Keith v. Schievelbein, 53 S.D. 421, 229 N.W. 858; Birken v. Hickey,42 S.D. 472, 176 N.W. 137; Dwyer v. Chicago N.W.R. Co., 41 S.D. 535, 171 N.W. 760. Upon the entitre record in the instant case, a majority of the judges, while not in agreement with the reasoning or conclusions of the trial court, are nevertheless of the opinion that a substantially correct result was arrived at. The judgment and order appealed from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Birken v. HickeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Keith v. SchievelbeinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Dwyer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust of Watertown v. KsenychSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API