Legal Opinion
Ind. Sch. Dist., No. 1 v. Bordewyk
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1932No. File No. 7288PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.
Plaintiff school district maintains a high school of twelve grades. So likewise does Tyndall independent school district. Defendant Bordewyk, a married man with family, was a resident of plaintiff school district for fourteen years prior to March i, 1929, and was a resident thereof with his family at the time the annual official school census for the year 1928 was taken. March 1, 1929, defendant Bordewyk removed with his family from plaintiff school district and established his residence in Tyndall independent school district. Plaintiff school district is entitled to charge tuition for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Yankton-Clay County Drainage DitchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Corsica State Bank v. HeezenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Plucker v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- McDowell v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Security State Bank v. SykoraSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spriggs v. Altheimer, Arkansas School District No. 22Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. CottonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Spriggs v. Altheimer School District No. 22Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967