Legal Opinion

In re Yankton-Clay County Drainage Ditch

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1916No. File No. 3790PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay 'County. Hon. Robert B. Tripp, Judge. Drainage proceedings in wihiiohi C. M. Snow is claimant, upon a 'hearing before 'drainage commissioners for establishment of tlie Yankton-Clay County Drainage Ditch, «for damages for right of way of s'aid ditch, etc. From a judgment disallowing claimant’s claim, and from an odder denying- a new trial,. claimant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay 'County. Hon. Robert B. Tripp, Judge. Drainage proceedings in wihiiohi C. M. Snow is claimant, upon a 'hearing before 'drainage commissioners for establishment of tlie Yankton-Clay County Drainage Ditch, «for damages for right of way of s'aid ditch, etc. From a judgment disallowing claimant’s claim, and from an odder denying- a new trial,. claimant appeals. (1) To- point one of the opinion, Appellant cited: Laws 1909, Chap. 102, Secs. 2, 3; In re Sorenson Drainage Ditch, 27 5. D. 342; Walker v. Ry., 103 Mass. 10, 4 Am. Rep. ; Lewis on Eminent Domain, (3d Ed.)…

1Opinion of the CourtGate'S, J.

After the ’decision, of this court in Re Yankton-Clay County Drainage Ditch, 30 S. D. 79, 137 N. W. 608, and upon rehearing, 31 S. D. 496, 141 N. W. 393, the matter came before the joint hoards of Yankton and 'Olay counties upon the assessment of 'damages. The appellant herein, C. M. Snow, claimant, presartedi a claim for $7,000 damages to the southwest quarter of section 15, township 92, range 52, as follows, which said; land lies 80 rods south of the ditch as established:

“(1) Damage to said land in preventing the overflow waters from the Missouri and James rivers from passing off said-…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co. v. Peoria & Farmington Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Fargo v. AasethSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hurley v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Steinmetz v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Corsica State Bank v. HeezenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Plucker v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API