Legal Opinion
Reserve Mining Co. v. Cooke
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 20, 1985No. C5-85-577PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Relator Reserve Mining Company appeals from a determination by the Commissioner of Economic Security that when respondent Erton Cooke chose to retire during the course of a layoff, he was not thereby rendered ineligible for unemployment benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
Cooke was an employee of Reserve Mining from 1963 until 1984. Due to a lack of demand for Reserve’s product, Cooke was laid off in September 1984. There was no evidence that he would be reemployed. Shortly thereafter, in October 1984, Cooke chose to retire.
Cooke filed for unemployment benefits, and after a hearing,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Kollodge v. F. AND L. APPLIANCES, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Manufactured Housing Institute v. PettersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nichols v. JACK COOPER TRANSPORT CO., INC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Reserve Mining Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Summers v. R & D AGENCY, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Fettes v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & ResearchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Eastman v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.