Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1990No. Case H-89-16Published

1Opinion of the CourtGlasser, J.

This is an appeal by appellant, Administrator, Ohio Bureau of Employment Services, of a judgment rendered in favor of appellee, Earl Eastman. Appellee was employed by Plymouth Locomotive Works ("Plymouth") for approximately twenty-four years. Plymouth was found by the Secretary of Labor to be employment adversely affected by imports, 1 and on June 13, 1986, its workers totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 1, 1985 (the "impact" date) were certified as eligible to apply for Trade Readjustment Assistance ("TRA") benefits pursuant to the Federal Trade Act of 1974.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. James W. Begley v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  4. Rosemary Fortin v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary, Department of Labor, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. DonovanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API