Legal Opinion
Summers v. R & D AGENCY, INC.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 30, 1999No. C1-98-1645PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants, Mark and Lori Summers and their four minor children, contend the district court erred by: (1) dismissing their claim under Minn.Stat. § 176.82 (1998) that respondents obstructed Mark Summers’ receipt of workers’ compensation benefits; (2) dismissing appellants’ harassment claim based on respondents’ alleged violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.749 (1998); and (3) dismissing appellants’ claim against respondents for invasion of privacy.
FACTS
Appellant Mark Summers was an employee of Cargill, Inc., which is not a party to this appeal. On August 26, 1996, Summers was…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Woodruff v. 2008 MercedesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Conaway v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Daniel v. Honeywell International Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Foster v. LitmanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.