Legal Opinion
Reserve Mining Co. v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 26, 1985No. C2-85-1198PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Reserve Mining Co. (“Reserve”) appeals from a determination by the Commissioner of Economic Security that respondent Anderson was involuntarily discharged from employment and is therefore entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
On November 16, 1984, Anderson was notified by Reserve that she would be laid off November 30, 1984. On November 19, Reserve offered Anderson the opportunity to retire early under Reserve’s 70/80 retirement plan. That plan is available to employees who are at least 55 years old and have worked at Reserve for 15 or more…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re the Claim of FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Lumpkin v. North Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Aluminum Co. of America v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- York v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brady v. Board of ReviewSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Stacy v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Kehoe v. Minnesota Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- McArthur v. Borman's, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.