Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hagaman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9246PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Erom the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was a suit by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages for the obstruction of a private way of the appellee over the appellant’s land. There was a trial by jury, with a verdict for the appellee.

The appellant assigns errors as follows:

I. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute s, cause of action.

2. Error in overruling the demurrer to the complaint.

3. Error in striking out the second paragraph of the answer.

4. Error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

5. Error in overruling the motion to modify the judgment.

The complaint alleges that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hubler v. PullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Baker v. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. McCardle v. BarricklowIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Gronour v. DanielsIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  5. Johnson v. CuddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Harding v. CowgarIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hutchinson v. WORLEYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Switzer v. ArmantroutIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API