Legal Opinion

McCardle v. Barricklow

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The complaint in this case averred that the plaintiff, William T. McCardle, was the owner of a tract of land in Switzerland county, and that the defendant, Elizabeth Barricklow, was the owner of another tract of land in the same county, lying to the north of and adjoining the plaintiff’s land ; that, until some time in the year 1875, a portion of the plaintiff’s land lying next to the lands of the defendant, and containing about eleven acres, remained uninclosed, but that, during that year, the plaintiff erected a line of fence around the same ; that the defendant had torn down said fence,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Campbell v. RouttIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Palmer v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Mitchell v. ParksIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Peterson v. McCulloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Conner v. WoodfillIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Hill v. HagamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API