Legal Opinion

Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1895No. 17,100PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

— The appellant’s complaint against the appellee was in three paragraphs, in each of which he sought to enjoin the appellee from making an embankment in its roadbed at a point where it had maintained a trestlework. In two of said paragraphs, it was alleged that the embankment would wholly obstruct a private passageway under said trestlework, enjoyed by the appellant for more than twenty years; and in the third para*469graph it was alleged that said embankment would destroy a tile drain maintained by the appellant for his adjacent lands. Upon the issue formed, the court rendered a special finding,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Miller v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Bradford v. School Town of MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Donahue v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Null v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Clay v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Pitser v. McCreeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Monarch Real Estate Co. v. FryeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API