Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
— The appellant’s complaint against the appellee was in three paragraphs, in each of which he sought to enjoin the appellee from making an embankment in its roadbed at a point where it had maintained a trestlework. In two of said paragraphs, it was alleged that the embankment would wholly obstruct a private passageway under said trestlework, enjoyed by the appellant for more than twenty years; and in the third para*469graph it was alleged that said embankment would destroy a tile drain maintained by the appellant for his adjacent lands. Upon the issue formed, the court rendered a special finding,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Parish v. KaspareIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Nowlin v. WhippleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Miller v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Bradford v. School Town of MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Donahue v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Null v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Clay v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Pitser v. McCreeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Monarch Real Estate Co. v. FryeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.