Legal Opinion

Hubler v. Pullen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1857PublishedCited by 29 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This was an action upon a bill of exchange for 718 dollars. The bill is dated Cincinnati, July the 14th, 1854. It was drawn by the Ironton Rolling Mill Company, payable to themselves at Reynolds’s Bank, Lafayette, Indiana, at six months. It was accepted by Hubler and F'alley, who were the defendants below, and indorsed by the company to the appellees, who were the plaintiffs.

The defendants answered the complaint — First. By a general denial. Secondly. That the plaintiffs are not the real parties in interest. Upon the filing of the answer, the Court, over the defendants’ objection, permitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fry v. BennettThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
  2. Catlin v. GunterThe Superior Court of New York City · 1852

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Conkling v. . WeatherwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OrrIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. City of Atchison v. TwineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Burk v. AndisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API