Legal Opinion

Gronour v. Daniels

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1844PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR to the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

— This was an action .of trespass brought by Daniels for cutting and carrying away certain trees belong*109ing to the plaintiff. Pleas, 1. Not guilty; 2. Tender of amends. There was also a third plea which was rightly _ adjudged bad on demurrer, and which the defendant admits cannot be sustained. Replication in denial of the second plea. That plea should also have been demurred to, as it is obviously inadmissible. Such plea in trespass owes its origin to the statute of 21 James the 1st, 6 Bac. Abr. 481, which is not in force here. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The defendant, in his…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rasor v. QuallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Torr v. TorrIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Casey v. MasonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. City of Lafayette v. LarsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hill v. HagamanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API