Pee Dee State Bank v. National Fiber Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge:
This is an action on a note and guaranty agreement. The circuit court entered judgment against the guarantor, James R. Prosser, for the amount due on the note. Prosser appeals. We affirm.
The material facts are largely undisputed. In August 1981, Pee Dee State Bank loaned National Fiber Corporation $85,000. As security for the loan, the Bank required Earl M. Walls and Prosser, who were officers of the corporation, to execute guaranty agreements personally guaranteeing payment of the note. The loan was additionally secured by mortgages on real estate owned by Prosser and Walls.
In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HarleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Martin v. Carolina Water Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Ray v. South Carolina National Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Furst v. McNittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Warner v. WeaderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Campbell v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Carolina First Bank v. Stark, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Iseman v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Prosser v. Pee Dee State BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Wayne Dalton Corp. v. Acme Doors, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.