Legal Opinion

Prosser v. Pee Dee State Bank

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 25, 1988No. 22864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action to quiet title and enjoin Respondent Pee Dee State Bank (Bank) and the Sheriff of Florence County from executing on real property to enforce a judgment Bank obtained against the former husband of appellant Gail P. Prosser (appellant). The circuit court denied appellant relief, and she appeals. We affirm.

In August 1981, appellant’s husband (Husband) executed an unconditional continuing personal guaranty to Bank to enable his business to acquire Bank credit. Bank made loans to Husband’s business; the loans were secured by the personal guaranty and the assets of the business.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hussey v. HusseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Parrott v. ParrottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. Hursey v. HurseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. South Carolina Tax Commission v. BelkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SchifferliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. SchifferliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. Chanko v. ChankoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Hodge v. Hodge ex rel. Estate of HodgeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  5. United States v. AlquzahDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API