Iseman v. Hobbs
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Judge:
David R. Hobbs instituted this action to recover on a twenty thousand dollar promissory note signed by M. Daniel Iseman. Iseman unsuccessfully attempted to introduce evidence the note was unsupported by consideration. The circuit judge directed a verdict in Hobb’s favor for $25,699.00, including the amount of the note, interest, and attorney’s fees. Iseman appeals. We reverse and remand.
Iseman signed a promissory note dated February 8, 1984, in which he promised to pay Hobbs twenty thousand dollars and ten percent interest from the date of execution. The first sentence of the note…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Halsey v. Minnesota-South Carolina Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Gladden v. KeistlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Peoples Bank of South Carolina, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Pee Dee State Bank v. National Fiber Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Timms Ex Rel. Estate of Timms v. TimmsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gilliland v. Elmwood PropertiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Rodarte v. University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Crafton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Gilliland v. Elmwood PropertiesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Lingefelt v. Forest Hills Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.