Legal Opinion
Martin v. Carolina Water Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 30, 1984No. 0056PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
The principal issue in this breach of contract action is whether an “expansion and modification fee” constitutes a “connection or tap-on fee” within the meaning of a contract between the appellant Jimmy L. Martin and the respondent Carolina Water Service, Inc. Judgment below was entered for Carolina Water Service and Martin appeals. We affirm.
Martin is a developer engaged in the construction and sale of residential housing. Prior to February, 1974, he was the sole owner of all the stock of Rainbow Sewer Corporation. Rainbow owned and operated the water and sewer systems in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Blakeley v. RabonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Superior Automobile Insurance v. ManersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- McPherson v. J. E. Sirrine & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Thomas-McCain, Inc. v. SiterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Hamrick v. Cooper River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. SwainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Columbia East Associates v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- State v. RamseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- CATAWBA INDIAN TRIBE, SC v. City of Rock Hill, SCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Gibbs v. G.K.H., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.