Legal Opinion
Furst v. McNitt
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided February 8, 1919No. 21,924PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Appeal fromi Rooks district court; Charles I. Sparks, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
The plaintiffs broúght this action against B. McNitt, Henry Buss, and Elbridge Phillips, the defendants, upon the following written obligation:
“In consideration of Furst & Thomas extending credit to . . . Salesman [B. McNitt] we, the undersigned, jointly and severally, guarantee to them the faithful performance of this contract by him, and full settlement according to its terms, for all goods sold to him on credit by them, hereby .waiving notice of acceptance and all notice as to the account of said Salesman, and we agree that any extension…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burton v. DeweyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
- Citizens Bank v. BowdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- John S. Brittain Dry Goods Co. v. YearoutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- Emery v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Fall v. YoumansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kansas State Bank & Trust Co. v. DeLoreanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
- American Surety Co. of New York v. BlakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Minneapolis Brewing Company v. MerrittDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1956
- Verdigris River Drainage District No. 1 v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Howell v. AblahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.