Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Erickson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 7, 1996No. 13841PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.

Peter G. Conrad and Sobstad Sailmak-ers, Inc.,1 instituted a three count complaint against Ronald K. Erickson and Dorothy A. Erickson claiming constructive eviction, a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA)2 and intentional tortious interference with business relations. The defendants filed a counterclaim alleging unpaid rent and breach of a sales clause in a real estate contract. The juiy found in favor of the plaintiff against only the named defendant3 on all three counts of the complaint and in favor of the plaintiff on the defendants’ counterclaims. The jury…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Curry v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Kelley Property Development, Inc. v. Town of LebanonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Associated Investment Co. Ltd. Partnership v. Williams Associates IVSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Surgical Corp. v. Orris, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
  2. Holler v. Buckley Broadcasting Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. U. B. Vehicle Leasing, Inc. v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Chorches v. Ogden (In Re Bolin & Co.)District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
  5. Confidence Empire, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API