Legal Opinion
Holler v. Buckley Broadcasting Corp.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 24, 1998No. AC 16890PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiff, Frank J. Holler, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendants, Buckley Broadcasting Corporation, Wayne Mulligan and Wayne Griscom,1 following the granting of the defendants’ motion to strike.2 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that (1) the complaint failed to allege sufficient facts to support a claim of tortious interference with business relations and (2) General Statutes § 52-570d does not apply to the rerecording of an illegally taped telephone conversation. We affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- D'Amico v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Citizens Savings Bank v. Rohlman, No. Cv00-0434257 (Jul. 24, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Franchi v. American Lawyer Media, No. Cv98 06 39 99s (Mar. 13, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Hart v. Mill Plain Auto Body, No. Cv98 035 34 63 (Mar. 18, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Intelisearch Inc. v. Milo, No. Cv98 0163353 S (Dec. 4, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.