Zeimann v. Bennett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John J. Carney, Judge. Action by Charles Zeimann against D. A. Bennett, worthy president, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SPIARP, C.
Plaintiff sought to recover damages in the sum of $15,138.50 of the defendants, arising out of his expulsion from Subordinate rie No. 124, Fraternal Order of Eagles. It is' difficult, indeed, from the record before us to understand what was done in the trial court; but from the transcript, supplemented hy the nunc pro tunc judgment of the trial, court, and from the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, we infer that the order made by the trial court was treated as a final judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. An elaborate motion for a new trial,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wedd v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Humphrey v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Strange v. CrismonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6 of Caddo CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Seibert v. First Nat. Bank of OkeeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Scott v. AmisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Clark v. La BrueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Garland v. American Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ryus v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915