Legal Opinion

Garland v. American Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1916No. 7661Published

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. ITayson, Judge. Action by the American National Bank against IX N. Garland and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant named brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

This was an action upon a joint promissory note. A joint judgment was rendered against the defendants, D. N. Garland and E. H. Perry. The said Garland filed a motion for a new trial. The same was overruled, and ho alone brings error to this court.

It appeal's that the case-made was not served upon E. H. Perry, and that he has not been made a party to this appeal. Summons in error ivas not served upon him, and neither has he waived the same.

The motion to dismiss filed heroin must be sustained. It has long since become tlie settled and uniform bolding of this court that all…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wedd v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. May v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Continental Gin Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Price Miller v. RatcliffeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Zeimann v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API