Legal Opinion
Greenbaum v. Handelsbanken
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 1999No. 95 Civ. 3850 (SS)PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SOTOMAYOR, Chief Judge. 1
Defendant Svenska Handelsbanken, N.Y. (“SNY”) moves under Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for judgment as a matter of law vacating a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Victoria Greenbaum on her claims of sex discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the equivalent provisions of the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Administrative Code. In the alternative, SNY moves to reduce the jury’s compensatory damage award of $320,000 by $181,303…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Steven Weissman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dawn Joy Fashions,inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Sethi v. NarodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Koch v. GreenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Mugavero v. ARMS ACRES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.