Erving v. Jas. H. Goodman & Co. Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. F. E. Johnston, H. L. Johnston, and L. E. Johnston, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Nathan F. Coombs, and J. T. York, for Defendant and Appellant Napa Valley Brewing Co. Frank L. Coombs, for Respondent Jas. H. Goodman & Co. Bank.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff sued to recover damages for a failure by the alleged assignee of a leasehold estate to pay rents reserved in a certain lease. Judgment was given against plaintiff and in favor of Jas. H. Goodman & Co. Bank, but in favor of plaintiff as against Napa Valley Brewing Company. Two appeals were taken; one by plaintiff from that part of the judgment which was in favor of the bank and the other (based upon the judgment-roll alone) by the Napa Valley Brewing Company from that part of the judgment which is against it and in favor of plaintiff.
The findings of the court are in substance as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bingham v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Hines v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Coburn v. GoodallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Sheldon v. La Brea Materials Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Vucinich v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Summit Industrial Equipment, Inc. v. Koll/Wells Bay AreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Jackins v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Edgar v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.