Miller v. Southwest Airlines, Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this employment-discrimination action, defendants move under Rule 12(b)(1) to dismiss plaintiffs claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and under Rule 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motions are Granted in part and Denied in part.
STATEMENT
Plaintiff Claudia Miller is an African-American female who was employed by defendant Southwest Airlines, Co. as an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jose Chavez v. James ZiglarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Satyadi v. West Contra Costa Healthcare DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Helde v. Knight Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- Terris v. Cnty. of Santa Barbara, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Mickey Dilts v. Penske Logistics LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Gallup v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.